It occurs to me that NIST's assertion that it found no evidence of explosives at the WTC, twinned with its admission that it didn't test for explosives, serves as a pretty good analogy for a particuar kind of response people have to 9/11 Truth. Why don't you believe that the 9/11 Commission lied and ommitted crucial facts in their investigation? Because I've seen no evidence that they did. But have you looked? Well, no. Or, Yes, I've read newspapers, seen the TV reports...It's not that such views are without foundation. It's just that if the foundation is the mainstream press, then you've probably never even heard of WTC 7, Norman Mineta, the suspiscious put options, Atta's ISI link, etc. In other words, just because you haven't seen the evidence, doesn't mean it isn't there. And just because you don't believe that the Military Industrial Complex could do such a thing, doesn't mean they haven't.
-
Someone who clearly doesn't need any convincing is former Italian president Francesco Cossiga who recently spoke out about 9/11. In Corriere della Sera, Italy's oldest and most widely read newspaper, Cossiga said that 9/11 was 'planned and realised' by the CIA and Mossad (Israel's intelligence agency), and that US and European intelligence agencies all know this. As Paul Joseph Watson states in his article, this is unlikely to be mentioned by establishment media outlets. And I don't believe it was.
No comments:
Post a Comment